Evalgent

Deliver AI voice agents that perform with real users

Evalgent helps voice AI teams evaluate and ship production-ready agents faster and with confidence.

Functional testing
Behavioral testing
Limit testing

Refund Flow v2.1

ID: 2fccb77d... · Executed: Mar 28, 2026

200 total runs · 156 passed · 44 failed
Agent
Support Bot v3
Scenarios
5
Profiles
4
Metrics
6
Runs / Test
10
SSR Threshold
80%
Metrics Summary
across 200 runs
Avg Duration
45.2s
Avg Turns
8.3
Task Completion
92%
Tone Adherence
87%
Hallucination Detection
8%
Policy Compliance
78%

Problems teams face without an evaluation layer

Voice agents work in demos but break with real users

Demos don't reflect real behavior. Without a structured evaluation layer, teams lack a way to validate agents across scenarios and human interaction patterns before deployment.

Teams can't tell if failures are edge cases or systemic

Without repeatable evaluation, teams can't distinguish one-off failures from underlying reliability issues.

There's no visibility into how much user behavior agents can tolerate

In the absence of behavioral limit testing, deployment decisions rely on intuition rather than defined failure boundaries.

Fixing one issue often breaks something else

Without a consistent re-evaluation framework, regressions go undetected across agent iterations.

How we solve them

Scenario-driven functional evaluation

We define success at the scenario level and test whether the agent actually completes the intended objective end-to-end.

ScenarioActive

Refund request

Objective: Complete the refund process end-to-end

Success criteria

Agent confirms order number
Refund reason collected
Refund processed and confirmed

Behavioral testing with human interaction profiles

We stress agents using real human behavior patterns instead of ideal users.

Behavior profiles
Interruptions
Background noise
Fast speech
Impatient user

Limit testing to define failure boundaries

We push behavior and conditions until reliability drops below acceptable thresholds.

Limit testingThreshold: 80%
Normal95%
High noise78%
Extreme42%
Reliability drops below 80% under stress

Statistical reliability measurement

Every test is run multiple times to measure consistency, not luck.

Reliability report
ScenarioRefund request
Runs20
Success14
Failures6
Reliability70%

Evidence-backed outcomes

Every success or failure is explainable and auditable.

Conversation transcriptFailed

Hi, how can I help you today?

I need to cancel my subscription

Sure, let me look up your account. Can you provide your email?

I'd be happy to help you upgrade your plan!

Failure at step 4 — Agent misinterpreted intent

How does it work?

01

Define

Lock real scenarios and success criteria.

02

Run

Run them under realistic human behavior.

03

Measure

See what works, what fails, and where limits lie.

04

Act

Get clear, actionable insights on what to fix, tune, or deploy.

Evaluation is infrastructure

What It Is Not

Post-hoc analysis on production transcripts

What It Is

A pre-deployment testing layer that surfaces failures before users do

What It Is Not

LLM-as-judge scoring alone

What It Is

A controlled execution framework with defined scenarios and behaviors

What It Is Not

Optional or "nice to have"

What It Is

Foundational infrastructure for shipping reliable voice agents

What It Is Not

A reporting or monitoring tool

What It Is

A decision layer that determines production readiness

Know if your voice agent is ready for production